Yin-Yang
*SIGH*
The history in a nutshell is that I was in the same elementary school grade year for 8 years… from 1st through 8th… with a certain individual. As with most of my elementary school associates… well… they were just that, associates and not friends. There were eight years of emotional and physical abuse at the hands of that group… and very few moments (come to think of it, only one moment in all that time) that make me smile when thinking about my time there. When High School time came I gladly left them going in one direction while I went in my own.
Of course, this person wasn’t truly removed from my existence. That summer we both began working at the rectory of our church/elementary school. He would work there for 3 years… and I would be there for 7 years after he left. We didn’t often see or talk to one another… only occasionally during the major holy days of the faithfully observant CAPE Catholics (Christmas, Ashes, Palms, Easter) did we work together. The relationship was civil at best.
Of course, in High School I was a bit lost in finding myself. The journey and transformation I made there was, for lack of a better term, evolutionary. Unfortunately, after 2 years of failing Math and Spanish, and a final act of defiance 5 days before the end of my sophmore year by inciting a riot in the school against the man who was holding 4 fellow schoolmates (seniors) on hallowed charges when all they were doing was attempting to save the empire, truly sealed my fate for the following year.
That summer, after my mother went to this school in tears out of fear of me having to attend a sub-standard public school, I went to summer school at the High School I would eventually call my alma mater. Let me be clear about this… I really could have cared less for that school. Its reputation was and still is for shit. It was the school where honor roll reading was The Little Engine That Could… without pictures! Yeah. They didn’t impress my bloated 15 year old ego.
Amazingly… he was there too. I think we shared the Math class together. We had both become somewhat refugees in this foreign environment… of which we both viewed it as being not worthy of our obviously superior, summer school needing, intellect. So we became a bit friendlier and socialized a bit more… most notably in the lunchroom.
Of course… as expected… that January there was a “glitch”. We had agreed to swap days at work… and while I worked his day, he decided to tell a third worker in the office that he wasn’t going to be working mine. So I called him the night before about it… and he started yelling at me about how I was interrupting him with a girl and blah blah blah. Needless to say… I was pissed… and I cancelled my own plans and worked my shift.
Things shifted that Monday in the cafeteria, as I was no longer “welcome” to sit with him and a few new friends he had made. So… I sat at a table in the middle alone. Now don’t go feeling bad for me… because that lasted 3 days before I got pulled into a table of football players by this one guy Jugghead. To be honest… I really used to hate jocks… but those three guys went out of their way to make me feel welcome and not so alone… and yeah… I helped them pass English… but they didn’t know I came from a school where the Freshman curriculum was the exact same as the current Junior curriculum. So… literally… I have not spoken to this person nor been on speaking terms with him since that day.
*SIGH*
It was bound to happen sooner or later. Yesterday I joined a group on Facebook for my old High School class. I really didn’t think anything of it… just clicked it in mindlessness while trying to level up in Mob Wars. Two hours later I had a new friend request. Anyone want to guess who it was from? Yep… this person I haven’t spoken to since that day back in 1991. It has been 17 years… and my first instinct was to hit the Ignore button.
But how long can you hold a grudge or be bitter with someone for? Is there any point where it’s just being petty? I mean c’mon… it is just Facebook we’re talking about… or is it?
Your thoughts and opinions are requested in the comments box.
We thank you for your input.
I really had zero intention of blogging today. Unfortunately Avitable had to start some shit about drugs that was carried over from the Clearly Your Retarded show where he is the co-gladiator with Miss Britt. The topic of the show was Should a pharmacist or physician be able to deny you medication or treatment based on their personal moral or religious beliefs? Pretty hot topic right? While I’m not looking to make it any hotter… I do want to clarify my views and better explain my reasoning without leaving a post in comments as I was tempted to do.
Also please understand that in this case I am referencing those pharmacists who work for a corporate pharmacy such as CVS, Duane Reade, Walgreens, or whichever one you choose. I do not feel that an independent pharmacy owned by the pharmacist must distribute something they feel is contrary to their personal beliefs and morals, unless it is mandated by their regulating agency.
I believe that a pharmacist or a physician who denies you medication or treatment based on their personal moral or religious beliefs should be de-certified/ have their license revoked and face the repercussions that their state law allows. Why do I feel this way?

I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone.
-The Hippocratic Oath
Physicians
Physicians today still take the Hippocratic Oath before beginning medical school. The truth is, while medicine is still considered an art there have been a number of advances including both examination and treatment protocols for the vast varieties and ailments that have been identified. It is in fact possible for a doctor to refuse to become a patient’s physician. However, what must occur for that to happen is the doctor must find another physician within a certain geographic location who is willing to take the patient. Then, once that physician has been found, there is a 3 month period of consultations and exams done jointly between the two doctors before the first doctor is relieved of his obligation.
Additionally, in regards to patients without the ability to pay, hospitals with emergency rooms and the doctors that operate in them are under the Federal Emergency Medical Treatment And Labor Act (EMTALA). Basically what EMTALA does is say that they MUST treat you, you and your unborn, and stabilize you. Additionally, EMTALA regulates ambulances and prevents us from picking a “stabilized” patient up from one hospital and bring them to another without having a pre-arrangement for a bed and a receiving doctor. Unfortunately, before the regulations, ambulances routinely did this type of “patient dumping” from facility to facility of uninsured patients which only added to our ill repute as meat wagons.
EMTs
The reason I am bringing EMTs into the mix is, because, well I am one. Surprisingly or not, EMTs and Pharmacists have A LOT of things in common. EMTs are certified/licensed by regulating agencies in the states that they work. EMTs operate under the license of a physician. EMTs are held to regulations and standards that vary state by state, including what is called Duty To Act (DTA). DTA basically states that when an EMT is on duty, it is his responsibility to act either to a call assigned by the dispatcher or to people injured on the street. DTA applies to BOTH paid and volunteer EMTs.
If an EMT refuses to act, by either refusing a call or driving by a scene where people may be hurt, injured, or are “flagging you down” (even if you already have a patient onboard), that EMT is in a heap of trouble. The penalties can include suspension or revocation of their license, fines, and criminal charges that can result in jail time. These same penalties can be applied by the regulating agency for Failure to Act, Patient Abandonment, and Gross Negligence. Then there are the lawsuits. Usually they’re small because we get lumped in with hospitals, doctors, nurses, and the police… but every agency needs malpractice insurance because of it.
Pharmacists
Pharmacists are certified/licensed by regulating agencies in the states that they work. A Pharmacists job is to provide federally approved and regulated narcotics to people based on the prescription of their doctors. A Pharmacist operates under the direction of the physician (through the prescription). A Pharmacist however, does not operate under a DTA. I think that’s what part of the problem is… and what part of the legislation is aiming to do.
If a Pharmacist refuses to fill a prescription because of his personal moral, I honestly don’t know what happens to him. What SHOULD happen is his license should be subject to suspension or revocation, he should be subject to fines, and he should be eligible for criminal charges. The Pharmacist has a job to do and if he refuses to do it, just as if an EMT refuses to do his job, he should be subject to the consequences.
But the issue is bigger than Pharmacists. The issue is about morality vs. duty, and when they conflict which one should be adhered to without repercussions.
American Morality
One of the contributing factors to the dilemma is the very nature of American Morality… or more specifically the lack of cohesiveness to it. We pride ourselves on being founded with religious freedoms and the separation of church and state as a cornerstone building block. Yet American laws, symbols, and traditions smack of the popular religions at the time of the country’s birth. Religion has been intertwined into our lives, and the morals it carries with it has been interwoven with the very laws we live by. Utah having previously been a state of legal polygamy, Nevada being a state with legal prostitution, and California being a state with legal marriage of same sex couples all go to show the variety of moral values and how states change based on the majority.
For a country with a cornerstone being the separation of church and state, we’ve surely clung our government to the very thing of persecution that inspired the founding of this country. Personally, I am against state sanctioned same sex marriage. Shocked? You really shouldn’t be because in fact, I am against state sanctioned opposite sex marriage. I am against the use of the word marriage in any law, proclamation, or license. I believe that marriage is a word originating from religion to define the joining of a man and a woman in the eyes of God. This is what my religious education taught me… and that same education uses that argument against same sex marriage. I do not believe the word has purpose anywhere in government. I am for governmental benefits to those who join in a civil state sanctioned union, whether it be same sex or opposite sex, and I think that once you disassociate the religious word from the governmental status it suddenly becomes a non-issue.
I do not believe a Bible should be used in court for an oath to be sworn upon… in fact I think it should be the penal code for that state, or in the case of the President of the United States, he should take his oath with his hand on THE Constitution. A little tidbit: there is no mention or requirement for the use of a book of religious text or for the incoming President to end the oath with, “So help me God.” That has been added in time and time again… because people don’t really want to separate their Church from their State as much as they claim.
What does this do for American Morality? It makes it a murky watered beast with more shades of gray than Crayola crayons has colors.
American Duty
As a human being I have obligations to both society and myself. Failure to fulfill those obligations are not without consequences on either side. The obligations I have to society, my American Duty, I find commonality with alot of people. They are the same people who chose the same type of career path that I have… doctors… nurses… other EMTs… nurse aides… pharmay techs… pharmacists… those who serve under the Rod of Asclepius.
As an EMT I have an obligation to serve those around me in the capacity of an EMT. As I mentioned in a previous post, I am a proponent of euthanasia. I believe in quality over quantity when it comes to life. So when I go to a nursing home, to find a vegetative and contracted husk of a body in cardiac arrest, do I refuse to do CPR because it is against my moral belief of quality over quantity? No. In that moment, my sense of duty overcomes my moral sensitivities. This is the career I consciously chose, and this is the job I agreed with my employer that I would do. I will do my best to bring this poor person back to life… for however long they are kept alive on machinery until a family member can take the time to come and relieve them of their painful existence.
My obligation to society, as someone who chose to work in an aspect of healthcare and therefore be a contributor to the art of medicine, is to fulfill that role as best I can. It is indeed a service role, but unlike a waiter or a cab driver (other service roles), I am directly contributing to both your quality and quantity of life. It is what I chose to do… there is no question about who is right and who is wrong… it is my duty and it is clear cut black and white. Most importantly it is the same for me as it is for every other EMT in the state.
Moral Duty
Of course there is also Moral Duty. This is the sense of obligation you feel based on your personal moral values. This can be a tougher thing to act upon in society, because not everyone around you will understand or agree with your sense of duty or the morals it is based upon. There is no shared commonality, and if it conflicts with your duty to your role in society then it will obviously cause friction.
Following your sense of duty to society may cause you internal strife and grief. Maintaining your sense of Moral Duty when in conflict with your duty to society can, and usually is, viewed as a selfish and discriminatory act. Moral Duty is individually based, and therefore not necessarily in the best interest of the whole.
Of course there will be those who will say I am advocating communism or socialism. I’m not advocating that in the slightest, but considering that we are essentially talking about businesses and people who are paid through Federal programs funded with your tax dollars such as Medicare and Medicaid, there should be accountability and regulation. That regulation should include the assurance that there be no product discrimination or favoritism.
In Conclusion
As an EMT, I have chosen to perform this job. I have chosen this career and have chosen to fulfill the obligation I have to those around me as best as I can. If your sense of Moral Duty to yourself outweighs that of your sense of American Duty to society around you, then the only honorable and ethical thing to do is to remove yourself from a service career and role in society that is compensated by tax dollars. That is why I ultimately think a pharmacist or a physician who denies you medication or treatment based on their personal moral or religious beliefs should be de-certified/ have their license revoked and face the repercussions that their state law allows.
So last week I received an e-mail from someone regarding something they had heard/read. For the record, I am extremely bad about replying to e-mails because of the fact that I read them, star them to respond properly later, and then later on I just get backed up so I rarely get to respond back. I know… I suck that way. Yet, I definitely wanted to respond to this e-mail… but obviously half-way through my response, I realized it would probably make a better blog post… so here it is.
The Question
Are people who are terminally ill “lucky” to know their death is imminent?
The question itself might seem a little bit in conflict with itself, but consider that I do not think the term “lucky” is used in its normal sense, like in hitting lotto. I think “lucky” is a relatively poor term to use there, perhaps replacing it with “fortunate” would be better usage. Hence the reason I will consider the question to actually be:
Are people who are terminally ill “fortunate” to know their death is imminent?
I do not want the original e-mail author to think I have changed the question at hand, but I do think that the word they chose in asking the question lends itself to the probability of misinterpretation. Now that the question has been clarified, I will provide my views and opinions on the matter. It is important to keep in mind that these are in fact MY views and opinions, and while you may share them or you may not, it is important to read the entire post and the reasoning behind my opinions before jumping the proverbial gun in the comments section.
From The Outside
From the viewpoint of someone unrelated to a terminally ill patient, there are a number of benefits that one can see:
- •The ability to get business affairs in order and updated
- •The ability to spend time doing things they’ve always wanted to do (aka “Bucket List”)
- •The ability to spend quality time with family and friends
- •The ability to get personal affairs in order and updated
- •The ability to plan and communicate their final wishes
While all of these seem to be gifts of knowledge, there are other viewpoints that have to be taken into consideration. From the viewpoint of someone related to a terminally ill patient, this is what they see:
- •The knowledge that there is no need to buy the patient a Christmas gift this year
- •The knowledge that the patient will not be carving the turkey at Thanksgiving this year
- •The knowledge that the patient will not be turning 21+ this year
- •The knowledge that the patient will not be at the wedding of his (INSERT RELATIVE HERE) next year
- •The knowledge that the patient will be deteriorating before their very eyes
Right there is a huge difference in viewpoint. The unattached outsider thinks in terms of “can” and the attached outsider thinks in terms of “will not”. Still, there is a more important viewpoint to consider.
The 5 Stages of Grief and Dying
Although I have already talked about Kübler-Ross‘s model of The 5 Stages of Grief when it came to myself, this is more of a general post geared towards the viewpoint of the terminally ill, so allow me to reiterate those stages slanted from their perspective:
- 1. Denial and Isolation- At first, the diagnosed tend to deny the reality of the news. They begin looking for second and third opinions, may turn to alternative medicines, and may withdraw from their usual social contacts. This stage may last a few moments, a few weeks, or longer.
- 2. Anger- The diagnosed may then be furious at the person who gave them the news (usually a doctor), angry at friends and family who appear oblivious to their emotional state, and at the world for moving on without them. They may be angry with themselves as well for having allowed events or habits to have taken place, even if, realistically, nothing could have stopped it.
- 3. Bargaining- Now the diagnosed person may make bargains with God, asking, “Just let me see my children graduate?” or ”I’ll do anything, just make it go longer.”
- 4. Depression- The diagnosed feels numb, although anger and sadness may remain underneath.
- 5. Acceptance- This is when the anger, sadness, and bargaining have tapered off. The diagnosed simply accepts the reality of the situation and can begin preparing for it. This may happen within minutes, days, weeks, or it may not happen until just moments before their death. There are some where it will not happen at all.
Now while the Kübler-Ross model has been around since 1969, and there have recently been some studies that have shown some inconsistencies with it, I can tell you from personal experience that they are as accurate as you can get for describing the emotional reactions of individuals on a greater scale. It is important to keep in mind though that everyone is in fact an individual, and while their reactions can loosely be defined within this broad scope it is in no way shape or form a definitive answer for a patient’s emotional state.
As a healthcare provider it is most important to keep in mind these stages when dealing with terminally ill patients, specifically the anger stage since often times their anger may be directed at us. Although the anger is misplaced, we cannot take it as a personal affront, but rather remember why the person is truly angry and maintain the compassion that we have for their situation irregardless of their words/actions. I usually have to remind the rookies that if it were us instead of them, wouldn’t we want the same understanding and compassion? I tend to think we would.
From The Bed
The viewpoint of the diagnosed is not as simple as it may seem. Sure, they have been told they have X amount of time left, but there is no firm date given like the one from the Internet Death Clock. At best, what they are given is an estimate. Indulge me while I give you two personal examples as to the “accuracy” of life expectancy:
My uncle was diagnosed with intestinal cancer. He had surgery and went for one round of chemo, after which his doctors told him that he responded extremely well and after two more rounds of chemo he would be considered in remission. After the second round of chemo my cousin brought him home. He walked in the door, called out my aunt’s name, and then collapsed in cardiac arrest in the hallway. The cancer did not kill him… it was an acute myocardial infarction.
While passing from complications or other ailments is not an uncommon occurrence, living past your expectancy by twice the amount of time is:
My Tante Albina was diagnosed with cancer of the liver. No treatments helped, and she was told in February she had 3 months to live. In May she was admitted to Calvary Hospital, which is in fact a hospice, since they expected her to pass any day. She had to fight to avoid being discharged in October, because by then her house had already been sold to pay for her stay and there was no immediate family to take care of her. Since the hospital had been charged with her assets, there was no money to assist in paying for homecare that they did not want to provide. Her time in the hospital had her relying on a self-medicated morphine drip, she developed a number of skin ulcers, she had become incontinent, and relied on a tube for feeding. She finally succumbed to the cancer in December of that year, a full 7 months after the initial diagnosis had placed her demise.
The diagnosed person, while knowing that the time they have on this earth is more imminent than most, still does not know what awaits them. While there is this knowledge, there is also uncertainty. It is that uncertainty, coupled with the uncertainty of what will happen after they are actually gone that makes this knowledge more painful than already knowing the following:
- •They will not see their children/grandchildren marry
- •They will be the cause of grief and pain in the lives of their loved ones for which they can provide little or no comfort
- •They will not see what the future holds for anyone
- •They will leave a hole in the lives of their loved ones for which they cannot provide every minute detail, unlike Michael Keaton in My Life
- •They will undoubtedly face pain beyond the threshold that anyone should endure… and at what price will relief come?
While it may be argued that at any time we may walk out the door and never walk back in due to any number of unforseen circumstances, how many of us are haunted by the knowledge that this will happen irregardless of what we do? How many people have literally had hope robbed from them before their deaths? The diagnosed patient has had those very things happen. Perhaps, after reaching the acceptance stage they will be able to see themselves as fortunate for having this knowledge, but I tend to think those in the other stages do not see any fortune in it at all, and especially considering the lack of options offered in the country where they live.
Hospice vs. Euthanasia
Part of the pain of having this knowledge is the loss of control one feels over their own life. While we have a sense of helplessness when we experience the loss of someone suddenly, we still maintain control over our own lives. The loss of control over one’s own life and lack of options is undoubtedly the greatest feeling of helplessness coupled with an absence of hope that one can experience and that will inevitably result in a deep depression.
A number of people point to the hospice system as the way for terminally ill diagnosed patients to go. Hospice care, however, is not only not cheap, but not as simple as it sounds. Hospice care usually involves assigning the patients benefits over to the hospice, and the hospice becomes sort of your new HMO. They manage your care, providing pain relief and comfort while cutting out what is considered unnecessary life lengthening care such as diagnostic tests and life supporting machinery. Hospice does provide a family support network, often will carry out funeral arrangements on the behalf of the diagnosed, and will offer home care so the patient can remain in a comfortable and familiar setting if that is their wish.
Sadly, being in the United States, euthanasia is not an option for the terminally ill. The fact that control over their life has been taken away by a disease, we as a country do not see the right of the person to retake that control over their life through medical intervention on the patient’s own terms. We would rather see them push madly on a button to induce a morphine infusion to quell the pain along with their level of consciousness and lucidity that puts them into a state of continuous drool and dismay than give them the option of ending their lives with dignity intact. We are a country where we will tell someone that they have 3 months to live, but will not give them the actual control over their ending.
In Conclusion
This is a very complex subject which truly has no right answer for the masses. This is more of an individual based answer, and to which there is no right or wrong when dealing with oneself. I do think it is wrong to assume that what answer we consider correct for ourselves can be projected onto others so easily. I tend to think that when approaching it, most people will jump to conclusions based upon their own viewpoints out of either laziness of truly thinking through the subject or a disregard for the viewpoint of others, and that is clearly wrong.
Personally, I do not see these patients as fortunate at all. I see them as being given life altering knowledge that will in effect change their reality instantly, similar to how reality changes for those who lose a loved one spontaneously. I tend to think that those people who would see them as fortunate are those that continue to exist in the anger stage of losing someone suddenly, and cannot see past that anger to the viewpoint of those who have received the news a few months in advance. I can understand why they would see them as fortunate, but I cannot agree with that given the current lack of options available to the terminally ill today.
Hence, in conclusion, no I do not see terminally ill patients as being fortunate and yes, I am pro-euthanasia.
Is it a big secret that there once again is drama in this corner of the blogosphere? It was to me until I put two plus two and finally got four (which shall now be referred to as The Sum Total). I really think that people don’t believe I am as dense as I am when it comes to figuring stuff out like this, but I am… of this any number of people would be able to assure you.
Now I am not going to condemn the existence of The Sum Total. Blogging for the most part has been an awesome experience for me. Like life however, it is diverse in not just the types of people you meet but also in the opinions being posted out there. Ultimately, blogging is about opinions, and opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one. Unless of course… you have a colostomy bag from a bowel obstruction or something… but you get the idea, right?
I am not going to condemn the content of The Sum Total. It is what it is, which is crass atypical 5th grade schoolyard humor. I will say that one of the bloggers spoken about in such a manner was dragged into it not because of their own actions, but because of an association. In fact, when the same level of humor was being used by the very person they are associated with, this blogger actually condemned it for what it was, which is crass atypical 5th grade schoolyard humor. This unfortunately proves that while you may have beautiful eyes and perfect 20/20 vision, you can still be blinded to the truth.
I am not going to condemn the person/people behind the content of The Sum Total (thus far). They have a right to express themselves how they wish, as juvenile as it may seem to others. I am a believer in truthfulness and point of view. If this is how they honestly feel from their point of view, and there have been no indications that they haven’t been, then that’s fine by me. In fact, I can see why they would feel such a way on a number of points. This does not mean I necessarily agree with it, but I can understand where it comes from.
I am going to call bullshit on The Sum Total based on the following e-mail conversation with Head Total:
To: Head Total
From: NYCWD
Subject: If You Want Hate Mail…… I’ll give you hate mail.
BUT.
You obviously need to write about me to get it.
So… how about you write a scathing post about what a big fat dork I am, how I have four eyes, pubic hair glued to may face for a goatee, and how my cereal consumption has caused a serious shortage of food in Africa (all of these are just random ideas that you are free to take/use for your own… of course originality will garner you more points)… and I’ll send you a piece of hatemail.
Sound like a deal?
Sincerely,
NYCWD
Now I think I was more than accommodating in offering to give Head Total both hate mail (which was requested) AND provide some writing sparks for them. I don’t think I was asking for too much… an insult here, an insult there… maybe an uncensored honest opinion or two, which I think would probably do me a world of good.
Instead I got this as a response from Head Total:
To: NYCWD
From: Head Total
Subject: Re: If You Want Hate Mail…I could never write a shitty post about a man who lost his only child. I don’t care how much of a dick you might want the world to believe you are. I know better.
Did you catch it? Did you see the sucker punch there? Here… let me cut it out for you:
I could never write a shitty post about a man who lost his only child.
Wow. They’re pretty good at pushing the right buttons huh?
But ya know what… that isn’t what this post is about. In fact, all the stuff before this is pretty much irrelevant and not the point of this post at all. Ready for the point?
The point is that I was damaged in 1981 when I witnessed a kid down the street get literally driven over by a car. I was damaged in 1983 when I was taunted about my glasses in the schoolyard. I was damaged in 1987 when I got a concussion during a fight in the same schoolyard and woke up in a hospital with my grandmother grabbing at the football size hematoma on the back of my head. I was damaged in 1990 when I saw my grandmother waste away from cancer before my eyes. I was damaged in 1991 when my first true true true love I asked out said no, and undoubtedly from the subsequent copious drug usage that year. I was damaged in 1994 when my supposed fiance’ broke off the engagement and the relationship. I was damaged on August 24, 1996 when the skin from a 7 year old fire victim came off onto my hands while doing CPR. I was damaged at Woodstock ‘99 when I saw my generation destroy not just a concert field, but a dream for a better tomorrow. I was damaged in 2001 when I lost good friends, and more importantly a partner, in one of the darkest days in this country’s history. I was damaged in 2004 when my wife decided to leave me for another woman. I was damaged in 2005 when I saw firsthand exactly how little not only the government thinks of EMS, but the actual people we are supposed to be helping… until of course they suddenly needed us. Finally, yes, I was shattered on June 21 last year when I lost my son.
NEWSFLASH
I’m still here. I have a pulse, I breathe, and worst of all I think. I think I have proven I was damaged before this blog even began. I think that if your willing to write a “shitty post” about people who do not want to be written about in that way… but unwilling to write one about someone who is ASKING for a “shitty post” to be written about them because of something that happened in their life… well that’s what I consider undue pity because of damage done during this blog’s lifespan. You can take your pity, shine it up nice and bright, turn it sideways, and shove it straight up your candy ass.
I don’t want anyone’s pity.
I don’t want anyone walking on eggshells.
I want some goddamn fucking honesty back considering that is what I GIVE.
Like me for being me. Love me for being me. Hate me for being me. Not because of anything I’ve gone through.
Now that this little rant is out of the way, you’ll have to excuse me while I go chase these GreenPeace fuckers with their buckets of water and helicopters away.
According to the Internet Death Clock my personal date of death will be on September 7, 2019.
Seems like a long way off… but it really isn’t.
So a few weeks ago Lisa was on Karl’s radio show and they were talking about, ”The Power of Blog”. It’s kind of like the power of attorney for bloggers. The person granted with ”The Power of Blog” basically fulfills your last request on your blog… meaning they put up your last post, change your template, or do whatever it is that you want done when you have moved from the virtual world into the spiritual ether.
Sadly, you can see an example of blogging posthumously over at Punk Rock Mommy, because yesterday morning Andrea made that journey and her last post in her own words are up. I was a bit awestruck by this one line…
Death is far more about the living than the dead.
There is truth in that statement. A scary and unshakable truth that cannot be proven false scientifically and relies upon faith in the intangible to do so. I myself learned firsthand the comfort that blind faith can bring in the face of death… even to the most cynical of which I was/am. Personally, I like the whole Dead Like Me idea that you go to your own wake and funeral before going up or down first.
This actually isn’t a new topic for me. I’ve already posted about dead blogs and what should happen in the case of my own untimely journey. Looking back though, I realize that I need to update some things since that was over 2 years ago. Hell, I need to update a lot since it hasn’t been updated in over a year and a half. Even though the wisdom that is the Internet Death Clock says I still have 11 years, its something that really should not be put off.
If there’s one thing I know for sure… you never know what tomorrow will bring… and Tony Soprano is still right after all these years.
”Everyday is a gift.”
Have you made your intentions/plans yet?











