I can’t believe I had to ask you what a bald bird is…

I thought you were euphemisming us.

That graphic is definitely spot on, though.

Upon further reflection, the McCain campaign has changed its mind on using the condom. It seems that at some point the condom had indirectly used by terrorist.

The only economic pinch he’ll ever feel is whether or not he should sell one of his houses.  He’s just as out of touch with the normal American as John Kerry, Ross Perot and Steve Forbes were.

No Shit!! 

Spot on!

~ZZ

"An out of touch and crazy old coot.” Hilarious! This is a line that needs to be used in a pro Obama/Biden ad!

OMG… laughing so hard because that is both funny and true.... scary true, though.

"can only work if they have jobs!”

Exactly.  I fucking hate the insinuation that “well, you people just need to work harder” - like the economy is going to shit because of a rash of laziness.

Heh, Britt said ‘you people’.

Shut up, I know she was quoting.

Anyways, I find it interesting that Obama’s new plan includes a one-year $3000 tax break on businesses that hire a new worker.

So does that mean he’s acknowledging that cutting taxes helps job growth?  I sure hope so!  Cuz based on the tax increases he’s voted for (2009 budget he’s for increases taxes on people making as little as $43k) and are proposing for his administration, it sure seems that a lot of places will have to let go of more people.  I mean, what small business (1-500 employees) do you know of that has less than $250k revenue/yr? Given that Obama hasn’t disclosed the details of his plan, like if it counts individuals or businesses, or if it’s revenue or profit, or if it includes inventory, or if you can fire someone and hire someone else for the tax credit, we’re kind of left hanging.

But we shouldn’t be surprised.  He hasn’t disclosed much at all.  His birth certificate’s a forgery, his medical records off-limits, his occidental school records locked away, his harvard school records are unavailable… Not many records exist for this Obama guy.  Not even much of a Senate record to speak of.

Oh well.  I guess the country is gonna vote for the most marketed, hyped up candidate ever and resort to name-calling the one candidate we actually *know* stuff about.

Whall, did you just resort to a “better the devil you know than the one you don’t” argument?

I expect better from you.

When I think of Republicans who can argue ideology, fundamentals and principles vs. conspiracy theories and numbers that ultimately mean nothing from either side - I usually think of you.

Discrediting a man because he’s run a better campaign is ludicrous.  Especially considering how the last guy got into office.